3 minutes reading time
(652 words)
There’s No Passing PAS 9980 By!
PAS 9980 keeps coming back into view. Every time the building safety conversation moves on, it seems to circle straight back.
On paper, it is guidance for assessing the fire risk of external wall systems in existing blocks of flats. In practice, it has become far more than that. It influences funding decisions, remediation plans, insurance conversations and, ultimately, how safe residents feel in their own homes.
Over the past year, the direction of travel has become clearer. Government has already indicated that Fire Risk Appraisals of External Walls - FRAEWs - are expected to follow PAS 9980. Funding routes such as the Building Safety Fund and the Cladding Safety Scheme already require assessments to be carried out in line with it. That means, even before any formal legal mandate, PAS 9980 is operating as the benchmark.
That is why it cannot simply be passed by.
PAS 9980 was introduced to encourage proportionate decision-making. The idea was to move away from blanket assumptions and instead look carefully at the whole building - materials, height, layout, fire strategy - and decide what level of risk is acceptable in that specific context.
That sounds sensible. Yet the reality has proved more complicated.
The framework allows for professional judgement. Two competent assessors can look at the same building and reach different conclusions about what is tolerable and what must be removed. For building owners and residents, that difference is not academic. One report might recommend monitoring and management. Another might recommend full remediation at enormous cost.
That inconsistency is one reason PAS 9980 remains controversial. Government has acknowledged that conflicting assessments slow projects down and create uncertainty. There is now a stronger push for clearer competence standards and greater oversight of those carrying out FRAEWs.
At the same time, the British Standards Institution has been working on revisions to PAS 9980. A further update is expected this year, with the aim of tightening language and improving clarity around decision pathways. The fact that it is still being refined shows that the industry is learning in real time.
Insurance adds another layer to the debate. PAS 9980 focuses on life safety. Insurers, understandably, also think about property protection. A building might be assessed as presenting a tolerable risk to life, yet still pose a significant financial risk in the event of fire spread. That gap continues to influence premiums and terms, and it feeds the sense that one framework cannot answer every question.
There is also the simple human reality. Residents hear phrases like proportionate risk and tolerable outcome and wonder what that means for them. If materials remain on the façade, even with justification, confidence does not automatically return. Technical reassurance does not always translate into emotional reassurance.
None of this means PAS 9980 is redundant. It remains the central framework guiding external wall risk assessments in England. Funding schemes rely on it. Regulators reference it. Assessors are trained around it. If anything, it is becoming more embedded, not less.
Yet embedding a framework does not remove the tension around it. The challenge is consistency. The challenge is trust. The challenge is ensuring that professional judgement is exercised within clear, accountable boundaries.
This week on Cladding Matters, Gareth Wax is in the chair, joined by myself, Hamish McLay, and Stephen Day. The conversation returns to PAS 9980 with fresh context - where it now sits in practice, what revisions may bring, and why it continues to shape the lived experience of thousands of residents.
Because in today’s building safety landscape, there really is no passing PAS 9980 by.
Never miss an episode of Spilling the Proper-Tea again, subscribe to our YouTube Channel to catch or watch live: https://www.youtube.com/@SpillingTheProper-Tea
PS:
For content enquiries:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
For podcast/media info:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
On paper, it is guidance for assessing the fire risk of external wall systems in existing blocks of flats. In practice, it has become far more than that. It influences funding decisions, remediation plans, insurance conversations and, ultimately, how safe residents feel in their own homes.
Over the past year, the direction of travel has become clearer. Government has already indicated that Fire Risk Appraisals of External Walls - FRAEWs - are expected to follow PAS 9980. Funding routes such as the Building Safety Fund and the Cladding Safety Scheme already require assessments to be carried out in line with it. That means, even before any formal legal mandate, PAS 9980 is operating as the benchmark.
That is why it cannot simply be passed by.
PAS 9980 was introduced to encourage proportionate decision-making. The idea was to move away from blanket assumptions and instead look carefully at the whole building - materials, height, layout, fire strategy - and decide what level of risk is acceptable in that specific context.
That sounds sensible. Yet the reality has proved more complicated.
The framework allows for professional judgement. Two competent assessors can look at the same building and reach different conclusions about what is tolerable and what must be removed. For building owners and residents, that difference is not academic. One report might recommend monitoring and management. Another might recommend full remediation at enormous cost.
That inconsistency is one reason PAS 9980 remains controversial. Government has acknowledged that conflicting assessments slow projects down and create uncertainty. There is now a stronger push for clearer competence standards and greater oversight of those carrying out FRAEWs.
At the same time, the British Standards Institution has been working on revisions to PAS 9980. A further update is expected this year, with the aim of tightening language and improving clarity around decision pathways. The fact that it is still being refined shows that the industry is learning in real time.
Insurance adds another layer to the debate. PAS 9980 focuses on life safety. Insurers, understandably, also think about property protection. A building might be assessed as presenting a tolerable risk to life, yet still pose a significant financial risk in the event of fire spread. That gap continues to influence premiums and terms, and it feeds the sense that one framework cannot answer every question.
There is also the simple human reality. Residents hear phrases like proportionate risk and tolerable outcome and wonder what that means for them. If materials remain on the façade, even with justification, confidence does not automatically return. Technical reassurance does not always translate into emotional reassurance.
None of this means PAS 9980 is redundant. It remains the central framework guiding external wall risk assessments in England. Funding schemes rely on it. Regulators reference it. Assessors are trained around it. If anything, it is becoming more embedded, not less.
Yet embedding a framework does not remove the tension around it. The challenge is consistency. The challenge is trust. The challenge is ensuring that professional judgement is exercised within clear, accountable boundaries.
This week on Cladding Matters, Gareth Wax is in the chair, joined by myself, Hamish McLay, and Stephen Day. The conversation returns to PAS 9980 with fresh context - where it now sits in practice, what revisions may bring, and why it continues to shape the lived experience of thousands of residents.
Because in today’s building safety landscape, there really is no passing PAS 9980 by.
Never miss an episode of Spilling the Proper-Tea again, subscribe to our YouTube Channel to catch or watch live: https://www.youtube.com/@SpillingTheProper-Tea
PS:
For content enquiries:
For podcast/media info:
Stay Informed
When you subscribe to the blog, we will send you an e-mail when there are new updates on the site so you wouldn't miss them.
Comments