4 minutes reading time
(823 words)
Young Renters Rejected, Young Buyers Struggling: Time To Fine Landlords?
This Thursday at 10am, Property Quorum returns to look at a debate that is quietly gathering momentum across the private rented sector. Some campaign groups are now calling for landlords to face fines if they discriminate against young renters. The idea has been raised in response to growing concerns that younger tenants, particularly those leaving supported accommodation, are struggling to access the private rented market.
At first glance, the argument sounds straightforward. If discrimination is taking place, surely something should be done about it. Yet once the detail begins to surface, the conversation becomes far more complex.
Research published recently by youth homelessness organisations suggests that a significant proportion of young people attempting to secure a tenancy encounter barriers at the referencing stage. Guarantor requirements are often cited as the biggest hurdle. Many landlords understandably ask for a homeowner guarantor or a strong financial history before agreeing a tenancy. For younger applicants, especially those just starting out in employment or moving from supported housing, that can be difficult to provide.
It is from this position that campaigners have suggested stronger intervention. Some are now proposing that landlords who routinely reject young applicants could face financial penalties. The aim, they argue, is to open the private rented sector to a group that currently finds itself locked out of many opportunities.
Yet the rental market rarely operates in such simple terms.
Landlords, agents and lenders all view tenancy decisions through the lens of risk. Mortgage conditions, insurance requirements and affordability checks have become increasingly strict over recent years. Referencing agencies examine income levels, credit history and employment stability. These checks are designed to protect both landlord and tenant from arrangements that may struggle to hold together over time.
When a landlord asks for a guarantor or certain income thresholds, it is often less about personal judgement and more about navigating those financial and regulatory realities.
The situation is also unfolding at a time when the private rented sector itself is under considerable pressure. Legislative change has been gathering pace. The Renters’ Rights Bill proposes the removal of Section 21 no-fault evictions, while compliance expectations across licensing, energy standards and safety requirements continue to expand.
Some landlords have already begun reassessing whether the sector still works for them.
Figures from property analysts and rental platforms suggest that supply in parts of the private rented market has tightened as landlords exit or reduce their portfolios. When supply shrinks while demand remains high, access to housing becomes more competitive for everyone, including younger tenants trying to find their first home.
That challenge is not confined to the rental market. Young first-time buyers often encounter similar obstacles. Mortgage lenders apply affordability rules, credit history checks and deposit requirements that can be difficult for younger buyers to satisfy. Without family support or accumulated savings, many find themselves navigating the same structural barriers as young renters trying to secure a tenancy.
In that sense, the debate around access to housing stretches beyond one part of the market. It touches on the broader question of how younger households establish their first foothold in housing at all.
That context matters when discussing fines or penalties.
If landlords feel they are being asked to take on additional risk without corresponding safeguards, some may simply decide the sector is no longer worth the effort. The unintended consequence could be a further reduction in rental stock, which would ultimately make access harder rather than easier.
There is also the practical question of enforcement. Local authorities already carry responsibility for policing a wide range of housing standards and regulations. Introducing a new framework for identifying and proving discrimination in tenancy decisions would raise its own operational challenges.
For many observers, the conversation may ultimately come back to the guarantor problem. If younger tenants cannot easily provide guarantors, perhaps the answer lies in alternative solutions such as state-backed or council-backed guarantee schemes. Several local authorities have experimented with these approaches, effectively stepping in to provide reassurance where family support is not available.
Whether such schemes expand nationally remains to be seen. What is clear is that the debate around access to the rental market is only just beginning.
On Property Quorum this Thursday at 10am, Gareth Wax hosts the discussion alongside myself, Hamish McLay, with regular contributors Juliet Baboolal of gunnercooke and Silas J Lees of WiggyWam joining the conversation. As always, the aim is to explore the issues openly, consider the practical realities and reflect on how policy ideas translate into the everyday workings of the property market.
It will be interesting to see where opinion settles on this one.
Never miss an episode of Spilling the Proper-Tea again, subscribe to our YouTube Channel to catch or watch live:
https://www.youtube.com/@SpillingTheProper-Tea
PS:
For content enquiries:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
For podcast/media info:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
At first glance, the argument sounds straightforward. If discrimination is taking place, surely something should be done about it. Yet once the detail begins to surface, the conversation becomes far more complex.
Research published recently by youth homelessness organisations suggests that a significant proportion of young people attempting to secure a tenancy encounter barriers at the referencing stage. Guarantor requirements are often cited as the biggest hurdle. Many landlords understandably ask for a homeowner guarantor or a strong financial history before agreeing a tenancy. For younger applicants, especially those just starting out in employment or moving from supported housing, that can be difficult to provide.
It is from this position that campaigners have suggested stronger intervention. Some are now proposing that landlords who routinely reject young applicants could face financial penalties. The aim, they argue, is to open the private rented sector to a group that currently finds itself locked out of many opportunities.
Yet the rental market rarely operates in such simple terms.
Landlords, agents and lenders all view tenancy decisions through the lens of risk. Mortgage conditions, insurance requirements and affordability checks have become increasingly strict over recent years. Referencing agencies examine income levels, credit history and employment stability. These checks are designed to protect both landlord and tenant from arrangements that may struggle to hold together over time.
When a landlord asks for a guarantor or certain income thresholds, it is often less about personal judgement and more about navigating those financial and regulatory realities.
The situation is also unfolding at a time when the private rented sector itself is under considerable pressure. Legislative change has been gathering pace. The Renters’ Rights Bill proposes the removal of Section 21 no-fault evictions, while compliance expectations across licensing, energy standards and safety requirements continue to expand.
Some landlords have already begun reassessing whether the sector still works for them.
Figures from property analysts and rental platforms suggest that supply in parts of the private rented market has tightened as landlords exit or reduce their portfolios. When supply shrinks while demand remains high, access to housing becomes more competitive for everyone, including younger tenants trying to find their first home.
That challenge is not confined to the rental market. Young first-time buyers often encounter similar obstacles. Mortgage lenders apply affordability rules, credit history checks and deposit requirements that can be difficult for younger buyers to satisfy. Without family support or accumulated savings, many find themselves navigating the same structural barriers as young renters trying to secure a tenancy.
In that sense, the debate around access to housing stretches beyond one part of the market. It touches on the broader question of how younger households establish their first foothold in housing at all.
That context matters when discussing fines or penalties.
If landlords feel they are being asked to take on additional risk without corresponding safeguards, some may simply decide the sector is no longer worth the effort. The unintended consequence could be a further reduction in rental stock, which would ultimately make access harder rather than easier.
There is also the practical question of enforcement. Local authorities already carry responsibility for policing a wide range of housing standards and regulations. Introducing a new framework for identifying and proving discrimination in tenancy decisions would raise its own operational challenges.
For many observers, the conversation may ultimately come back to the guarantor problem. If younger tenants cannot easily provide guarantors, perhaps the answer lies in alternative solutions such as state-backed or council-backed guarantee schemes. Several local authorities have experimented with these approaches, effectively stepping in to provide reassurance where family support is not available.
Whether such schemes expand nationally remains to be seen. What is clear is that the debate around access to the rental market is only just beginning.
On Property Quorum this Thursday at 10am, Gareth Wax hosts the discussion alongside myself, Hamish McLay, with regular contributors Juliet Baboolal of gunnercooke and Silas J Lees of WiggyWam joining the conversation. As always, the aim is to explore the issues openly, consider the practical realities and reflect on how policy ideas translate into the everyday workings of the property market.
It will be interesting to see where opinion settles on this one.
Never miss an episode of Spilling the Proper-Tea again, subscribe to our YouTube Channel to catch or watch live:
https://www.youtube.com/@SpillingTheProper-Tea
PS:
For content enquiries:
For podcast/media info:
Stay Informed
When you subscribe to the blog, we will send you an e-mail when there are new updates on the site so you wouldn't miss them.
Comments